One thing I’ll be doing sometimes over at the YouTube channel is taking blog posts and turning them into video presentations. Some recent comments by Cameron Bertuzzi of Capturing Christianity prompted me to do this with my article on the Church Fathers on the Eucharist. A lot of anti-apologist apologists quote the Church Fathers when they said that the bread and wine of the Eucharist are the body and blood of Christ, as though it proves that they believed in transubstantiation. It doesn’t!
JD
Apologies I’ve you’ve addressed this elsewhere and that its not directly on topic to the video, but do you mind sharing where you personally fall on this issue? Do you take the eucharist simply as a memorial or do you think there is some spiritual element to it that doesn’t go as far as full transubstantiation?