Right Reason

The blog of Dr Glenn Andrew Peoples on Theology, Philosophy, and Social Issues

Religion and Mental Health

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Are religious people on the whole more likely to be mentally ill?

We live in a world where people form strong opinions (or rather, are happy to see their already strong opinions/biases reinforced) by browsing headlines. So when people see the (still fairly recent) headline, “Spiritual people are more likely to be mentally ill,” you can guess what prejudices will be reinforced. “Religion is a symptom of an unwell mind!” Or maybe “Religion is so crazy that it makes those who believe in it go mad!”

Here, as with many misunderstandings, the solution is simply taking a few minutes to read and digest the information before leaping to conclusions.

We’re baaack!

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

1 Feb 2013. Here it is. Over the last little while my family has moved house (from Dunedin to Wellington) and begun settling into a new environment, we’re all living together again (!), and as promised Say Hello to my Little Friend is back in action for 2013!

This isn’t going to be like 2012. 2012 was slow. Now that life is back to something resembling normality, you’re staring down the barrel of blog and podcast output of 2011 proportions. Regular blogs, podcasts, reviews, and off-site activity to boot, including a stint as camp speaker for the Word of Life church in Auckland in late April.

As we launch headlong into 2013 here at SHTMLF, here are just a few reminders / requests / notices / whatever:

  • If you’d like to have me speak at an event on any of the subjects I cover at the blog (or others, just ask), feel free to drop me a line. I’d love to take more opportunities to speak to groups on theology, biblical studies, apologetics or related issues, but the trick is knowing where the interest is.
  • If you’d like to become a supporter, helping me to produce material here at the site and also providing me with the opportunity to invest in more resources to increase my output and to take part in potentially more speaking engagements, have a look at my donate page for my info.
  • You’re always welcome to contact me with suggestions for future blog and podcast subjects. I can’t promise anything, but asking never hurt anyone.
  • Lastly, invite your friends to check this site out! I want to spread the word far and wide to liven up the discussion and to let more people know about what’s available here, to make this year at Say Hello to my Little Friend better than ever. They should read the blog policy before jumping into the discussion.

Enjoy 2013

Counting down

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

New year’s day 2013 is just six hours away. But that’s not what you should be counting down for.

Friday, 1 February 2013. That’s the day you should be counting down for.

Merry Christmas 2013

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Now get off the internet.

The New Inklings

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

When I was in Oxford in 2010 it was my quaint pleasure to have a few pints (although not all during the same visit) at the Eagle and Child Pub on St Giles – a pub since 1650, and a favourite meeting place at midday on Tuesdays for nearly two decades of the “Inklings”: C. S. Lewis, J. R. R. Tolkien, Tolkien’s son Christopher, Lewis’ brother Warren (“Warnie”), Owen Barfield, Roger Lancelyn Green, Adam Fox, Hugo Dyson, R. A. “Humphrey” Havard, J. A. W. Bennett, Lord David Cecil, Nevill Coghill, and in the time leading up to Lewis’ death, Walter Hooper. The Inklings would usually meet to discuss pieces of writing that its members were working on, and occasionally to engage in a bit of literary frivolity.

Not long ago I met with fellow Wellingtonian Richard Goode, who blogs over at Eternal Vigilance, at Trax Bar and Café at the Wellington Railway Station. We discussed philosophy (ethics and philosophy of religion) and politics (sensibly, nothing like what you see on New Zealand news media), and I realised again how much I miss that in real life. It’s not exactly the Eagle and Child, I know, but Richard put to me the idea of meeting regularly to discuss a reading and inviting like-minded people to the “New Inklings.” The fact that that day also marked the world premiere of Peter Jackson’s movie adaptation of Tolkien’s The Hobbit seemed to make the suggestion all the more apropos. Richard and I are Christians with a PhD each in philosophy, and the readings would have some connection to one or both of those things at various times; philosophy, theology, biblical interpretation, social and justice issues from a Christian perspective, religion in the public square and probably other things.

We welcome those who would like to meet regularly for similar discussion. You don’t need a PhD, but a somewhat academic background wouldn’t hurt, and you’d certainly need academic interests. Do you have to be a Christian to take part? Well, not all of the original Inklings were (although granted, our subject matter will be a little different from theirs), and provided you’re interested in discussing the above issues with respect, good will and an irenic spirit, feel free to come along. Once we get a few people coming along (future gatherings will be advertised via our respective blogs and social media), we’ll also discuss things like how often we’ll meet in future, perhaps the venue, and such sundry matters.

So – our next meeting is…

When: 5 pm, Wednesday 12 December, 2012

Where: Trax Bar and Cafe, Platform 1, Wellington Railway Station

Topic: Theism, Atheism, and Rationality (a fairly well-known paper by Christian philosopher Alvin Plantinga)

See you there!

Glenn

Homeless

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

You’ll have noticed, if you’re a regular, that much of 2012 has been very quiet here.

As I announced back in April 2012, in May 2012 I moved to Wellington to work on a project for my employer. My fairly lowly job title and salary didn’t change, but the work was more engaging and the move would hopefully give me some experience that might help in getting a new job. I generally keep personal details out of the blog, but I don’t mind admitting that finances have never been great since graduating in 2008 (not that they were great before then, but that’s to be expected). Plus, if we could eventually move to Wellington there would be more opportunities in terms of jobs, speaking opportunities and who knows what else (Wellington is the capital of New Zealand and is centrally located). At the time we didn’t know whether my time in Wellington would be long or short-term. We’ve found out since then (a few weeks ago) that my time with the project has been extended until the end of June 2013, so we started making plans to move to Wellington with a view to me using the next six months or so securing a permanent job after June.

I thought that perhaps the blog output might have increased during my time here, but I was wrong. It’s hard to be in “normal” mode – or hard for me at any rate – when you’re away from the ones you love, living in a permanent state of limbo (or so it has felt). Plus, my access to the internet has been a bit more limited than before (I’m staying in an apartment building where the cheapest internet access I have is mobile broadband, which is fairly pricey here in New Zealand). I’ve been living apart from my wife and our four children for seven months now (visiting home one weekend per month, but for the last several months that became three visits every two months), and it hasn’t been easy – being a hermit is an interesting insight into one’s own mental health! Husbands and wives (and their children, some of the time) should be together.

However – and this is the point of this blog entry – all that’s about to change. A few days ago I was very pleased to learn that my application for a permanent job here in Wellington (with the same employer that I currently have) was successful and I will be starting on the 4th of February 2013. Change is in the air. Today my wife and kids say goodbye to our former home in Dunedin and start making the trek north (they will be joined by my wife’s father, who will make most of the trip with them). I suppose we’re technically homeless. They’re off to my in-laws (north of Wellington), where I will join them all for Christmas, and some time between now and the end of January we need to find a house to rent in Wellington (I still have this apartment until then). Wellington is much more expensive to rent in, but I’ll be earning a little more in my new role, so it evens out. We’ll just have to swallow hard and go a little more into the red to move our things up. The theory (and a pretty plausible one, say I) is that it’s worth it in the long term (and it’s still cheaper than replacing everything). Now… to seek out and make the most of the opportunities this may present.

I do aim to be more proactive in 2013 in reaching out beyond the blog and podcast. More on this in the near future.

So – there’s some background into what’s happening with me and why things have been a little slow here. I’ve set aside hopes of an academic role for the next little while in order to focus on reality (!!), but I’m certainly welcoming this change and the opportunities it may present. Once we’re set up in our new place, things should pick up again, and once we’re a couple of months into 2013 the blog and podcast should be back in full swing. It’s nice to see that there have still been plenty of visitors to the site, and here’s to many more in 2013.

Glenn

A brief comment on sin and political power

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

What, if anything, should the idea of sin do to our political vision?

Here’s another short post on religion and politics (even shorter than the last one), and it won’t be the last in the short term (I’m chipping away at a longer post on classical liberalism and welfare). A friend of mine commented recently that one of the reason’s she’s not a libertarian is that she believes that human beings are sinners. Another person quickly replied that the reason that he is a libertarian is that he believes that people are sinners. Both of these friends are evangelical Christians.

I think the first to speak in this instance was correct. There may be other reasons not to be a libertarian, granted, but one of the reasons is that human beings have this tendency to do the wrong thing; to be selfish, to not consider the needs of others, to be more concerned about our own rights than the rights of others and so on. If we lived in a libertarian society then, I strongly suspect that the plight of the less well-off would be much worse, among other things.

But it’s important not to make the opposite error: The error of thinking that since individual human beings are so messed up, what we really need is a group of these human beings in control with all the power, making sure all the areas of our life where we could go wrong are regulated. If one human being is a sinner, how is that problem solved if we put a bunch of sinners together and give them all the power? Just as individuals can go wrong by neglecting their responsibilities towards others in this thing called society that they want to have the benefit of belonging to, so those in power can go equally wrong. Their ideas about what is ultimately good for us, about how the goods of society are best spent, about what values should be enshrined in law, about what causes we should support, etc, are surely susceptible to error if each of those in the ruling party is as bad as the rest of us, and the idea of a group of sinners like us having the ability to force everyone to support those ideas and submit to them – all of them – is deeply dystopian in my view.

This is why I think that if the Christian idea of sin should push us in any direction politically, it should push us away from either of these extremes: From libertarianism at one end and socialism or any form of totalitarianism at the other. I think the classical liberal model does a good job of this.

What say you?

Glenn Peoples

Some very short thoughts about evangelicalism and welfare

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

My evangelical friends, I wanted you to hear this from one of your own. Welfare is not the devil. Quite the opposite, in fact. But do bear in mind: These are very short thoughts on evangelicalism and welfare. I do not intend to say much, so many important related issues are not touched at all.

I frequently see American Christian friends make comments about the welfare state, usually because they think it’s a bad thing. The line of argument is that “giving to the poor is good, but requiring others to give to the poor is bad. It’s Marxism, it’s theft, it’s requiring people to act moral when they’re not” and so on. There’s a quote from Penn Jillette to that effect that gets passed around along with those sentiments:

It’s amazing to me how many people think that voting to have the government give poor people money is compassion. Helping poor and suffering people is compassion. Voting for our government to use guns to give money to help poor and suffering people is immoral self-righteous bullying laziness.

People need to be fed, medicated, educated, clothed, and sheltered, and if we’re compassionate we’ll help them, but you get no moral credit for forcing other people to do what you think is right. There is great joy in helping people, but no joy in doing it at gunpoint.

I don’t care much for what Penn Jillette has to say on most things. But what I’m becoming increasingly bothered by is that my fellow evangelical Christians lap up this sort of rhetoric with a kind of religious zeal, as though this is a point of view that is especially appropriate for a Christian because it reflects Christian values. They shouldn’t. A Queens Personal Injury Attorney is always available to assist you in any sort of accident that happens to you. If you unfortunately become the victim of an accident and get yourself injured, a personal injury attorney is the most capable individual who can assist you to take necessary steps against the person responsible for that accident, as well as, to get remuneration. A personal injury attorney is a specialized lawyer who is well equipped with the knowledge of both injury laws and civil rights, sometimes they also wonder the birth injuries and birth defects what is a difference in such cases o faccident. An experienced personal injury attorney can easily categorize the severity of the injury of the victim along with the severity of the case. Thus, they can take necessary steps against the party for whose negligence the mishap happened. Again, if someone’s carelessness led to the victim’s injury, then the attorney takes steps accordingly. Whatever the reason may be and whoever may be responsible for the injury, the attorney tries their best to find out all of the related issues, and then take all the necessary steps against them. A good personal injury attorney is ready to assist you if any kind of accident happens to you. You may be a victim of, for instance, a vehicle accident, car, truck, bus, or van accident. Similarly, you may become the victim of a workplace mishap, for instance, because of development site or industrial site hazards. Whatever the type of accident may be, personal injury attorneys are prepared to assist you as needed – they are skilled in all kinds of injury cases. Personal injury attorneys are sincere in trying to preserve the rights of their clients. They deal with cases in such a way that is beneficial for their clients. Clients should help their appointed attorneys by providing them with all the necessary information. The client should not hide anything from the attorney that is related to the case. The attorney knows what information is important for the case and what should be kept out of the case. They will present anything that happened in such a way so that it will not hurt their client. So, you should not hide anything from your attorney because whatever you think is unimportant might be of dire importance to your attorney.

Whittling down the pacifist narrative: Did early Christians serve in the army?

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Is it true that Christianity was a pacifist movement for the first few centuries of its existence?

“Most serious scholars of church history today agree that for the first three centuries of the Christian church, Christians rejected not only emperor-worship and idolatry but also participation in the military.”

This quote was taken from a fairly unknown website. I picked it just because it reflects a confidence that a lot of Christians I have spoken to appear to have: The confidence that everyone who knows about this knows that the first few centuries of church history reveals that Christians were pacifists, and that got messed up later when theologians like Augustine compromised the teachings of Jesus with the worldly ways of violence.

Pacifism, Matthew 5 and “Turning the other cheek”

FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Long story short: “Turning the other cheek” does not mean becoming a pacifist. But some of you may require more persuasion than that, so keep reading.

On the 27th of October 2012 I enjoyed taking part in a panel discussion for Elephant TV on Christian views on war. Dr Chris Marshall (a former lecturer of mine) and Adrian Leason spoke on behalf of the Christian pacifist view, and Rev. Captain Paul Stanaway and I represented a just war perspective. Elephant TV is a fairly unique forum in New Zealand, bringing together Christians from different perspectives on contentious issues in front of an audience and cameras, getting a summary of their side of the story and putting questions to them to discuss. I think the event – and the series as a whole – is a fantastic idea to give exposure within the Christian community to the “elephant in the room” (where the show gets its title), those issues that we know are there and are important, but aren’t necessarily being discussed in churches in a way where all sides get a fair hearing.

The hope of all of this of course is not just that people will hear somebody say something they like and make up their mind on the spot, but that they will gain a new perspective to help them think more about these things for themselves. We were only able to scratch the surface of some of the issues mentioned, and as I said to people after the recording – there’s so much that we’d all no doubt like to have added, responded to, explained further, but that’s what blogs are for! Being stimulated to focus again on the issues of pacifism, the use of force and the role of Scripture in the discussion has meant that my thoughts have been occupied by some of the biblical material that frequently becomes part of the arsenal (pun intended) of Christian pacifists. Over the next little while I’ll be discussing some of that biblical material.

Page 21 of 78

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén